| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tyler Nietzsche
Weyland-Yutani Pan Galactic
87
   |
Posted - 2015.06.25 07:03:35 -
[1] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
okay you are 3 for 3 on confusing as hell commentary. wtf does framing burners have to do with rejecting them forever. You cant farm a burner if your NEVER RUNNING THEM !?!?
Adding the burner missions to level 4 agents was a lazy move by CCP. It was ok after the first batch of missions, but now its getting annoying. They could have treated it as on opportunity to add some new interesting things to the game, or at least other agents. |
Tyler Nietzsche
Weyland-Yutani Pan Galactic
87
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 08:37:46 -
[2] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
im going to guess based on your comfusing as hell comment that you are actually nevil oscillator posting on an alt. im not sure how to put this but you do know that my request is intended to remove the annoyance of burner mission rejection spam for those that choose to never run them.
in short, you are some how arguing at the same time both for and against my proposal, hence my confusion.
I agree that it is getting annoying due to the sheer amount of them, and suggesting that there are more alternatives to solve the problem than for / against your suggestion. |
Tyler Nietzsche
Weyland-Yutani Pan Galactic
87
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 09:05:35 -
[3] - Quote
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:Tyler Nietzsche wrote:Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
im going to guess based on your comfusing as hell comment that you are actually nevil oscillator posting on an alt. im not sure how to put this but you do know that my request is intended to remove the annoyance of burner mission rejection spam for those that choose to never run them.
in short, you are some how arguing at the same time both for and against my proposal, hence my confusion.
I agree that it is getting annoying due to the sheer amount of them, and suggesting that there are more alternatives to solve the problem than for / against your suggestion. Awesome i understood your point. What other options do you propose we consider?
Adding new agents for burner missions, as in my original post. Adding them as (even more) valuable rats at the end of new expeditions. Inventing new game play like touring the galaxy (hack / entosis random nullsec stations to find them). Making new exploration combat sites with them. Limit them to certain areas, or put them in an area for a certain time like incursions). The options are infinite. |
Tyler Nietzsche
Weyland-Yutani Pan Galactic
87
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 11:03:46 -
[4] - Quote
Barrogh Habalu wrote:Baljos Arnjak wrote:What CCP really needs to do is separate Burner missions into a new category of agent.
So normal missions have their normal agents and burner missions have burner agents, maybe call them Bounty Hunter agents or something. Then those that want to do burners and only burners can, and people who want to do normal and only normal missions can. Those that want to do both just hop in a shuttle and run over to where you do burners or vise versa.
This is something that has been brought up a few thousand times that they should have done from the get-go. Abusable. Burners are very profitable once you have the setup to do them. Right now it's balanced somewhat by the fact that you occasionally need to play that 3 chapters long Event Horizon reference or take standing hit. With separate agent you will be able to eventually switch to farming them exclusively. You can then make them not free to be declined, but it's just a matter of time before people will bring all those unified setups and, well, see above. Meanwhile, they still need to be more lucrative to justify working towards being able to complete them.
So, you need the old level 4 missions to "get in the way" of farming them. First they are "very profitable". At the same time you say they need to be more lucrative?
Why not balance them on their own merit, and let people who enjoy them run them? |
| |
|